PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVLH vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVLH vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than HEQT's 4.95% return.


OVLH

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.78%
YTD
7.26%
6M
6.86%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

HEQT

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.79%
YTD
4.95%
6M
5.64%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
7.26%15.77%18.44%16.93%-16.16%2.51%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.95%10.08%18.30%16.61%-8.25%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and HEQT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.89

The correlation between OVLH and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

OVLH vs. HEQT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OVLH
HEQT

Technology

35.7%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

OVLH
35.7%
HEQT
36.2%

Financial Services

OVLH
11.6%
HEQT
11.9%

Communication Services

OVLH
11.2%
HEQT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

OVLH
10.2%
HEQT
10.1%

Healthcare

OVLH
8.5%
HEQT
8.4%

Industrials

OVLH
8.3%
HEQT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

OVLH
4.9%
HEQT
4.9%

Energy

OVLH
3.5%
HEQT
3.5%

Utilities

OVLH
2.4%
HEQT
2.3%

Real Estate

OVLH
1.9%
HEQT
1.9%

Basic Materials

OVLH
1.8%
HEQT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVLH vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH
OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVLHHEQTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

2.34

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.34

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.94

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.05

13.45

-1.39

OVLH vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVLHHEQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.34

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.09

-0.16

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVLHHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-11.51%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-5.09%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

-10.57%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.06%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-2.79%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.11%

+0.43%

Volatility

OVLH vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 0.81%. This indicates that OVLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVLHHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

0.81%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.21%

5.27%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

6.38%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.71%

8.48%

+3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

8.48%

+3.31%

OVLH vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVLH vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than HEQT's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.19%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
0.28%0.30%0.32%0.83%0.79%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVLH and HEQT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVLH has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to HEQT (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 3-year performance, OVLH leads with 16.81% vs 13.47% for HEQT. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OVLH has performed better with a 16.81% return vs 13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVLH.

HEQT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.28% for OVLH.

OVLH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HEQT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.53% for HEQT.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVLH and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer