OUSM vs. WCEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. OUSM is passively managed, while WCEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OUSM returned 11.71%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for WCEO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WCEO.

Performance

OUSM vs. WCEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than WCEO's 11.34% return.

OUSM

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: —

WCEO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. WCEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF	6.80%	2.17%	13.45%	14.82%
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	11.34%	9.77%	8.28%	11.35%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and WCEO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023	0.89

The correlation between OUSM and WCEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSM vs. WCEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSM	WCEO
Industrials	22.8%	13.0%
Financial Services	21.1%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	15.2%
Technology	13.5%	15.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.5%
Utilities	3.9%	2.3%
Communication Services	3.8%	4.5%
Basic Materials	1.4%	5.1%
Energy	0.3%	6.9%
Real Estate	-	6.2%

Return for Risk

OUSM vs. WCEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM

OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 24
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 22
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

WCEO

WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. WCEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUSM	WCEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.98	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	2.92	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	4.33	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.47	13.47	-10.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUSM vs. WCEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the WCEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and WCEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUSM	WCEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.98	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.67	-0.19

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. WCEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than WCEO's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and WCEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSM	WCEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.84%	-25.88%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-6.96%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	-25.88%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.81%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-5.52%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	2.23%	+0.91%

Volatility

OUSM vs. WCEO - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) at 3.34%. This indicates that OUSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSM	WCEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	3.34%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	10.22%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.15%	15.22%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	18.13%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	18.13%	+0.81%

OUSM vs. WCEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than WCEO's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSM vs. WCEO - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than WCEO's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF	2.07%	2.09%	1.62%	1.64%	1.98%	1.55%	2.02%	1.99%	2.63%	2.17%
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	0.58%	0.64%	0.88%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSM and WCEO in my portfolio?

OUSM and WCEO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSM or WCEO?

OUSM has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to WCEO (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs WCEO's -25.88%.

Which ETF is better, OUSM or WCEO?

On 3-year performance, WCEO leads with 14.56% vs 11.71% for OUSM. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSM or WCEO?

Over the 3-year period, WCEO has performed better with a 14.56% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSM or WCEO?

OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSM or WCEO?

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.58% for WCEO.

What is the main difference between OUSM and WCEO?

They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Hypatia Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.85% for WCEO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WCEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.