PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. RSSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. RSSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than RSSL's 20.88% return.


OUSM

1D
0.58%
1M
1.49%
YTD
8.79%
6M
7.08%
1Y
11.70%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*

RSSL

1D
0.47%
1M
4.31%
YTD
20.88%
6M
17.67%
1Y
39.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. RSSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
8.79%2.17%7.84%
RSSL
Global X Russell 2000 ETF
20.88%12.87%10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and RSSL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.82

The correlation between OUSM and RSSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSM vs. RSSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSM
RSSL

Industrials

22.2%
17.8%

Financial Services

20.4%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
7.9%

Technology

14.5%
19.1%

Healthcare

9.9%
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.2%

Utilities

3.8%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.7%

Energy

0.3%
5.4%

Real Estate

-

5.9%

Industrials

OUSM
22.2%
RSSL
17.8%

Financial Services

OUSM
20.4%
RSSL
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSM
19.5%
RSSL
7.9%

Technology

OUSM
14.5%
RSSL
19.1%

Healthcare

OUSM
9.9%
RSSL
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

OUSM
4.6%
RSSL
2.2%

Utilities

OUSM
3.8%
RSSL
2.7%

Communication Services

OUSM
3.5%
RSSL
2.5%

Basic Materials

OUSM
1.3%
RSSL
4.7%

Energy

OUSM
0.3%
RSSL
5.4%

Real Estate

OUSM

-

RSSL
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. RSSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSL
RSSL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. RSSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSMRSSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.66

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

12.87

-9.14

OUSM vs. RSSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the RSSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and RSSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. RSSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, which is greater than RSSL's maximum drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and RSSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMRSSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-27.79%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-10.93%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-5.57%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.11%

+0.04%

Volatility

OUSM vs. RSSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.25%, while Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMRSSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

6.37%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

14.20%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

19.67%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

22.49%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

22.49%

-3.59%

OUSM vs. RSSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. RSSL - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than RSSL's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.03%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%
RSSL
Global X Russell 2000 ETF
1.24%1.35%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and RSSL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSL has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to OUSM (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs RSSL's -27.79%.

On 1-year performance, RSSL leads with 39.87% vs 11.70% for OUSM. On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSL has performed better with a 39.87% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.24% for RSSL.

OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while RSSL tracks Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.08% for RSSL.

RSSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and RSSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer