OUSA vs. VEGN
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while VEGN tracks the US Vegan Climate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSA returned 8.62%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for VEGN. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for VEGN.
Performance
OUSA vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 32.05% return.
OUSA
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
VEGN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- 1Y
- 50.54%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSA vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.05% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 6.62% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 32.05% | 13.71% | 25.42% | 38.10% | -26.87% | 26.01% | 27.72% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and VEGN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and VEGN has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
OUSA vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSA
VEGN
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OUSA
VEGN
Financial Services
OUSA
VEGN
Healthcare
OUSA
VEGN
Consumer Cyclical
OUSA
VEGN
Industrials
OUSA
VEGN
Communication Services
OUSA
VEGN
Consumer Defensive
OUSA
VEGN
Basic Materials
OUSA
-
VEGN
Energy
OUSA
-
VEGN
-
Real Estate
OUSA
-
VEGN
Utilities
OUSA
-
VEGN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
VEGN
OUSA vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSA | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.53 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 4.29 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 17.47 | -13.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSA | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 3.13 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.83 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.86 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VEGN drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and VEGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -34.14% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -11.85% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -20.91% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -33.40% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -0.64% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -7.59% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.90% | -0.55% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | VEGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 6.10% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 13.39% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 16.26% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 20.27% | -6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 22.77% | -7.61% |
OUSA vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than VEGN's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.42% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and VEGN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEGN has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs VEGN's -34.14%.
On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 16.69% vs 8.62% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.44% for VEGN.
OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.60% for VEGN.
VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and VEGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer