OUSA vs. SPIT
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. OUSA is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
OUSA vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- YTD
- 27.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSA vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 4.33% | 2.12% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.30% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and SPIT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OUSA vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -12.49% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -5.43% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -2.51% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | — | — |
Volatility
OUSA vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.84% | 26.39% | -16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 26.39% | -13.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 26.39% | -11.23% |
OUSA vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SPIT's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.64% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and SPIT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 1.38% for OUSA.
They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer