OUSA vs. QNXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while QNXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OUSA returned 9.81% vs 25.34% for QNXT. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QNXT.

Performance

OUSA vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than QNXT's 15.67% return.

OUSA

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

QNXT

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.67%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.05%	10.23%	-1.01%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	15.67%	14.97%	-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and QNXT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024	0.65

The correlation between OUSA and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. QNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	QNXT
Technology	23.4%	40.3%
Financial Services	18.5%	1.0%
Healthcare	14.1%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	17.0%
Industrials	11.6%	10.6%
Communication Services	11.4%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	5.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	2.7%
Real Estate	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	6.1%

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 27
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

QNXT

QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 49
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUSA	QNXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.70	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.37	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.50	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	8.17	-3.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUSA vs. QNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the QNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and QNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUSA	QNXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.70	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.90	-0.22

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than QNXT's maximum drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and QNXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	QNXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-22.25%	-10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-10.16%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-0.61%	-1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-3.79%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	3.11%	-0.76%

Volatility

OUSA vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	QNXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	3.52%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	10.92%	-3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	15.05%	-5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	19.73%	-6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	19.73%	-4.57%

OUSA vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than QNXT's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than QNXT's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.42%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and QNXT in my portfolio?

OUSA and QNXT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or QNXT?

QNXT has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs QNXT's -22.25%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or QNXT?

On 1-year performance, QNXT leads with 25.34% vs 9.81% for OUSA. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or QNXT?

Over the 1-year period, QNXT has performed better with a 25.34% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or QNXT?

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or QNXT?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.

What is the main difference between OUSA and QNXT?

OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QNXT is Nasdaq-100. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.20% for QNXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.