PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. OGIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. OGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than OGIG's -9.21% return.


OUSA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.29%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.22%

OGIG

1D
-3.46%
1M
6.90%
YTD
-9.21%
6M
-10.93%
1Y
-6.52%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
-2.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. OGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.05%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-0.84%
OGIG
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
-9.21%14.39%25.97%50.25%-50.64%-9.30%107.92%36.90%-24.48%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and OGIG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

0.54

The correlation between OUSA and OGIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OUSA vs. OGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
OGIG

Technology

23.4%
54.4%

Financial Services

18.5%
0.2%

Healthcare

14.1%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
16.5%

Industrials

11.6%
1.1%

Communication Services

11.4%
26.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

OUSA
23.4%
OGIG
54.4%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.5%
OGIG
0.2%

Healthcare

OUSA
14.1%
OGIG
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.4%
OGIG
16.5%

Industrials

OUSA
11.6%
OGIG
1.1%

Communication Services

OUSA
11.4%
OGIG
26.4%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.6%
OGIG

-

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

OGIG

-

Energy

OUSA

-

OGIG

-

Real Estate

OUSA

-

OGIG
0.7%

Utilities

OUSA

-

OGIG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. OGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

OGIG
OGIG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
OGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
OGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
OGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. OGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSAOGIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.97

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.20

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

-0.41

+4.60

OUSA vs. OGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the OGIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and OGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSAOGIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

-0.30

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

-0.07

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.27

+0.41

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. OGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum OGIG drawdown of -66.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and OGIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSAOGIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-66.05%

+32.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-33.23%

+24.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-33.23%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-62.79%

+43.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-24.99%

+22.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-25.67%

+22.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

15.84%

-13.49%

Volatility

OUSA vs. OGIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSAOGIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

8.15%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

18.28%

-11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

22.16%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

31.58%

-18.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

31.03%

-15.87%

OUSA vs. OGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OUSA and OGIG have an expense ratio of 0.48%.


Dividends

OUSA vs. OGIG - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than OGIG's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OGIG
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
0.08%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.42%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and OGIG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OGIG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs OGIG's -66.05%.

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.62% vs -2.07% for OGIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.62% return vs -2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA and OGIG have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index.

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and OGIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer