OUSA vs. OGIG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from O'Shares Investments - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSA returned 8.87%/yr vs -2.93%/yr for OGIG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.48% expense ratio.

Performance

OUSA vs. OGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than OGIG's -10.79% return.

OUSA

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 2.25%
• 6M: 3.37%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 10.11%

OGIG

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 3.19%
• 6M: -7.31%
• YTD: -10.79%
• 1Y: -11.56%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: -2.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. OGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	5.31%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-9.33%	23.75%	6.96%	25.03%	-0.87%
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF	-10.79%	14.39%	25.97%	50.25%	-50.64%	-9.30%	107.92%	36.90%	-24.48%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and OGIG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018	0.53

The correlation between OUSA and OGIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OUSA vs. OGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	OGIG
Technology	26.1%	56.4%
Financial Services	18.0%	0.2%
Healthcare	13.8%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	15.2%
Industrials	11.2%	1.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	25.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. OGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 44
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

OGIG

OGIG Risk / Return Rank: 6
OGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
OGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
OGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
OGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. OGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OUSA	OGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	-0.50	+1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	-0.55	+2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.93	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	-0.35	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	-0.66	+6.16

OUSA vs. OGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the OGIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and OGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. OGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum OGIG drawdown of -66.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and OGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	OGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-66.05%	+32.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-33.23%	+24.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-33.23%	+20.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-62.79%	+43.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-26.30%	+26.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-25.70%	+22.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	17.61%	-15.22%

Volatility

OUSA vs. OGIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 3.70%, while O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	OGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	7.72%	-4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.84%	19.78%	-11.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	23.32%	-13.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	31.76%	-18.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	30.96%	-15.80%

OUSA vs. OGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OUSA and OGIG have an expense ratio of 0.48%.

Dividends

OUSA vs. OGIG - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than OGIG's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.49%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and OGIG in my portfolio?

OUSA and OGIG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or OGIG?

OGIG has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to OUSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs OGIG's -66.05%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or OGIG?

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.87% vs -2.93% for OGIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or OGIG?

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.87% return vs -2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or OGIG?

OUSA and OGIG have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or OGIG?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.

What is the main difference between OUSA and OGIG?

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.