PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed DLN with an annualized return of 10.22%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


OUSA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.29%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.22%

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.05%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and DLN is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.93

The correlation between OUSA and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
DLN

Technology

23.4%
20.1%

Financial Services

18.5%
18.0%

Healthcare

14.1%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
5.0%

Industrials

11.6%
7.9%

Communication Services

11.4%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
9.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Energy

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

4.0%

Utilities

-

5.9%

Technology

OUSA
23.4%
DLN
20.1%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.5%
DLN
18.0%

Healthcare

OUSA
14.1%
DLN
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.4%
DLN
5.0%

Industrials

OUSA
11.6%
DLN
7.9%

Communication Services

OUSA
11.4%
DLN
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.6%
DLN
9.3%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

DLN
1.0%

Energy

OUSA

-

DLN
8.5%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

DLN
4.0%

Utilities

OUSA

-

DLN
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSADLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

3.69

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

15.59

-11.40

OUSA vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSADLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.53

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.93

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.15

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSADLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-57.84%

+24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-6.10%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-13.71%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-16.26%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-35.82%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.51%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-7.52%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.44%

+0.91%

Volatility

OUSA vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) have volatilities of 2.25% and 2.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSADLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

2.17%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

6.77%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

8.87%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

13.26%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

16.16%

-1.00%

OUSA vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.42%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and DLN have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSA has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.68% vs 10.22% for OUSA. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.42% for OUSA.

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer