OUSA vs. DGRS
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while DGRS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.36%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for DGRS. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DGRS.
Performance
OUSA vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has outperformed DGRS with an annualized return of 10.36%, while DGRS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
DGRS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 31.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.61M | $2.32M | $1.84M | |
| $914.72K | $1.31M | $1.45M |
OUSA vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 6.53% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 21.67% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 21.16% | -13.11% | 23.11% | 7.86% | 24.20% | -10.75% | 7.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and DGRS is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between OUSA and DGRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
OUSA vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSA
DGRS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OUSA
DGRS
Financial Services
OUSA
DGRS
Healthcare
OUSA
DGRS
Consumer Cyclical
OUSA
DGRS
Industrials
OUSA
DGRS
Communication Services
OUSA
DGRS
Consumer Defensive
OUSA
DGRS
Basic Materials
OUSA
-
DGRS
Energy
OUSA
-
DGRS
Real Estate
OUSA
-
DGRS
Utilities
OUSA
-
DGRS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
DGRS
OUSA vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.98 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 9.53 | -3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and DGRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -44.83% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -9.68% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -27.57% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -27.57% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -44.83% | +11.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.24% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -6.66% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.03% | -0.64% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 3.72%. This indicates that OUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.72% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 10.52% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 17.17% | -6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 20.22% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 23.57% | -8.38% |
OUSA vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than DGRS's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.04% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and DGRS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OUSA has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to DGRS (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs DGRS's -44.83%.
On 10-year performance, OUSA leads with 10.36% vs 9.82% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.36% for OUSA.
OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.38% for DGRS.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and DGRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer