OUSA vs. ALTL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while ALTL tracks the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSA returned 8.53%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for ALTL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ALTL.

Performance

OUSA vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 15.79% return.

OUSA

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: -0.06%
• 1Y: 10.34%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 10.19%

ALTL

• 1D: -3.95%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 15.53%
• 1Y: 39.21%
• 3Y*: 12.68%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	0.48%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-9.33%	23.75%	18.74%
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	15.79%	16.61%	12.30%	-15.85%	-10.67%	45.30%	35.38%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and ALTL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and ALTL has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	ALTL
Technology	26.1%	42.5%
Financial Services	18.0%	16.7%
Healthcare	13.8%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	12.4%
Industrials	11.2%	9.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	6.1%
Energy	-	1.8%
Real Estate	-	14.8%
Utilities	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 29
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 68
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OUSA	ALTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.92	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.52	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	4.02	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.37	13.55	-9.18

OUSA vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and ALTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	ALTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-31.91%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-9.79%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-21.21%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-31.91%	+12.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	-3.95%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-11.50%	+7.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.90%	-0.53%

Volatility

OUSA vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.92%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	ALTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	11.62%	-8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.42%	15.20%	-7.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	20.53%	-10.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.31%	18.97%	-5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	20.47%	-5.30%

OUSA vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than ALTL's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.88%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.43%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and ALTL in my portfolio?

OUSA and ALTL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or ALTL?

ALTL has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to OUSA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or ALTL?

On 5-year performance, OUSA leads with 8.53% vs 5.11% for ALTL. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or ALTL?

Over the 5-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or ALTL?

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or ALTL?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.88% for ALTL.

What is the main difference between OUSA and ALTL?

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.60% for ALTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.