OSUR vs. MTG
OSUR (OraSure Technologies, Inc.) and MTG (MGIC Investment Corporation) are both stocks. OSUR operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while MTG operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, OSUR returned -4.19%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for MTG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OSUR vs. MTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSUR achieves a 77.48% return, which is significantly higher than MTG's -2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, OSUR has underperformed MTG with an annualized return of -4.19%, while MTG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.
OSUR
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 63.31%
- YTD
- 77.48%
- 1Y
- 38.55%
- 3Y*
- -2.12%
- 5Y*
- -16.13%
- 10Y*
- -4.19%
MTG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 13.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
OSUR vs. MTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 77.48% | -32.96% | -55.98% | 70.12% | -44.53% | -17.90% | 31.82% | -31.25% | -38.07% | 114.81% |
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation | -2.59% | 25.88% | 25.68% | 52.41% | -7.50% | 17.19% | -9.20% | 36.71% | -25.87% | 38.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSUR and MTG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.21 |
The correlation between OSUR and MTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OSUR:
$295.70M
MTG:
$5.95B
OSUR:
-$0.74
MTG:
$3.19
OSUR:
3.60
MTG:
5.26
OSUR:
$85.12M
MTG:
$1.20B
OSUR:
$33.04M
MTG:
$864.52M
OSUR:
-$47.07M
MTG:
$724.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSUR vs. MTG — Risk / Return Rank
OSUR
MTG
OSUR vs. MTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) and MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSUR | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.71 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 1.45 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSUR vs. MTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSUR drawdown since its inception was -90.75%, smaller than the maximum MTG drawdown of -98.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSUR and MTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSUR | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.75% | -98.86% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.37% | -15.79% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.73% | -15.79% | -58.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.23% | -30.08% | -54.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.75% | -68.14% | -22.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.17% | -55.18% | -25.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.76% | -52.50% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.47% | 7.75% | +9.72% |
Volatility
OSUR vs. MTG - Volatility Comparison
OraSure Technologies, Inc. (OSUR) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) at 4.09%. This indicates that OSUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSUR | MTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 4.09% | +7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.32% | 19.30% | +15.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.28% | 23.07% | +25.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.84% | 25.14% | +29.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.59% | 37.08% | +19.51% |
Dividends
OSUR vs. MTG - Dividend Comparison
OSUR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTG MGIC Investment Corporation | 2.13% | 1.92% | 2.07% | 2.23% | 2.77% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 0.85% |
OSUR OraSure Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OSUR vs. MTG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OraSure Technologies, Inc. and MGIC Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OSUR vs. MTG - Profitability Comparison
OSUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.80K and revenue of 27.93K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.
MTG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 297.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
OSUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -23.18K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in an operating margin of -83.0%.
MTG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 297.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
OSUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OraSure Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -22.38K and revenue of 27.93K, resulting in a net margin of -80.1%.
MTG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MGIC Investment Corporation reported a net income of 165.30M and revenue of 297.08M, resulting in a net margin of 55.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OSUR and MTG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSUR has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to MTG (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSUR dropped -90.75% vs MTG's -98.86%.
OSUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSUR and MTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer