OSCV vs. VTWO
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. OSCV is actively managed, while VTWO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OSCV returned 5.11%/yr vs 6.28%/yr for VTWO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
OSCV vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 17.08% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 13.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
OSCV vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 8.34% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 10.14% | -11.41% | 27.69% | 4.94% | 27.51% | -13.52% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -19.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and VTWO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between OSCV and VTWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OSCV vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OSCV
VTWO
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
OSCV
VTWO
Industrials
OSCV
VTWO
Energy
OSCV
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
OSCV
VTWO
Real Estate
OSCV
VTWO
Healthcare
OSCV
VTWO
Basic Materials
OSCV
VTWO
Utilities
OSCV
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
OSCV
VTWO
Technology
OSCV
VTWO
Communication Services
OSCV
-
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
VTWO
OSCV vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSCV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 2.07 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 2.88 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.60 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 12.79 | -7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSCV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.07 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.52 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -41.19% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -10.99% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -27.57% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -31.88% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -1.50% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -8.39% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.08% | -0.53% |
Volatility
OSCV vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 3.47%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 5.73% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 13.50% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 19.12% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 22.48% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 23.08% | -2.17% |
OSCV vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCV vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than VTWO's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and VTWO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to OSCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 5-year performance, VTWO leads with 6.28% vs 5.11% for OSCV. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.10% for VTWO.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer