PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORCS vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORCS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCS achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -7.07% return.


ORCS

1D
9.77%
1M
-12.83%
YTD
-20.50%
6M
-12.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMF

1D
-1.57%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
-7.07%
6M
-9.80%
1Y
-4.79%
3Y*
-21.31%
5Y*
-30.66%
10Y*
-16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ORCS and TMF is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORCS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCS

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ORCS vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORCSTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.14

-0.18

Drawdowns

ORCS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCS drawdown since its inception was -50.25%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCS and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORCSTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.25%

-92.89%

+42.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.12%

-92.31%

+49.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

-43.65%

+28.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.63%

Volatility

ORCS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORCSTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

28.41%

+32.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.71%

46.71%

+14.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.71%

43.91%

+16.80%

ORCS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORCS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORCS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

ORCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than TMF's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORCS
Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF
1.08%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.20%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORCS and TMF have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORCS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORCS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 1.08% for ORCS.

ORCS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ORCS and 1.01% for TMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORCS and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer