ORCS vs. TMF
ORCS (Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ORCS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). ORCS is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. ORCS charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
ORCS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORCS achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -7.07% return.
ORCS
- 1D
- 9.77%
- 1M
- -12.83%
- YTD
- -20.50%
- 6M
- -12.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- -4.79%
- 3Y*
- -21.31%
- 5Y*
- -30.66%
- 10Y*
- -16.54%
ORCS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | -20.50% | 12.36% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -7.07% | -4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORCS and TMF is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORCS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
ORCS
TMF
ORCS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF (ORCS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORCS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | -0.14 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ORCS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORCS drawdown since its inception was -50.25%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCS and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORCS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.25% | -92.89% | +42.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.12% | -92.31% | +49.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.84% | -43.65% | +28.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.63% | — |
Volatility
ORCS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORCS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.71% | 28.41% | +32.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.71% | 46.71% | +14.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.71% | 43.91% | +16.80% |
ORCS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORCS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORCS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
ORCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than TMF's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORCS Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF | 1.08% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.20% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORCS and TMF have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORCS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORCS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 1.08% for ORCS.
ORCS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ORCS and 1.01% for TMF.
Find the right allocation for ORCS and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer