ORBX vs. IGF
ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ORBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
ORBX vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ORBX
- 1D
- -7.31%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
ORBX vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 22.02% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORBX and IGF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORBX vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
ORBX
IGF
ORBX vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORBX | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.31 | 0.24 | +4.07 |
Drawdowns
ORBX vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORBX | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -58.33% | +39.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.53% | -4.43% | -14.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -11.87% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
ORBX vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORBX | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.41% | 10.49% | +68.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 13.99% | +65.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 16.83% | +62.58% |
ORBX vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORBX vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.98% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORBX and IGF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ORBX.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.
ORBX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IGF is Industrials Equities. ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.39% for IGF.
Find the right allocation for ORBX and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer