PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORA vs. BBW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ORA vs. BBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORA achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly higher than BBW's -43.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ORA has underperformed BBW with an annualized return of 8.62%, while BBW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.01% annualized return.


ORA

1D
0.90%
1M
-13.31%
6M
-21.74%
YTD
-11.49%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.62%
ALL TIME*
9.66%

BBW

1D
-3.83%
1M
7.68%
6M
-42.43%
YTD
-43.92%
1Y
-29.88%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
12.01%
ALL TIME*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.11M$10.86M$12.86M
$86.66M$85.89M$116.62M

ORA vs. BBW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
-11.49%64.06%-10.05%-11.82%9.68%-11.59%21.92%43.45%-17.42%20.50%
BBW
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
-43.92%35.39%105.62%2.79%22.13%385.45%31.79%-17.97%-57.07%-33.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ORA and BBW is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2004

0.24

The correlation between ORA and BBW shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ORA:

$6.00B

BBW:

$425.27M

EPS

ORA:

$2.06

BBW:

$4.25

PE Ratio

ORA:

47.27

BBW:

7.98

PEG Ratio

ORA:

2.32

BBW:

1.14

PS Ratio

ORA:

5.18

BBW:

0.84

PB Ratio

ORA:

2.35

BBW:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

ORA:

$1.16B

BBW:

$526.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ORA:

$320.13M

BBW:

$302.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

ORA:

$398.22M

BBW:

$82.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORA vs. BBW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ORA
ORA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ORA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ORA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BBW
BBW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBW Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ORA vs. BBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ORABBWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.92

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.53

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

-0.85

+1.70

ORA vs. BBW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORA Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the BBW Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORA and BBW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ORA vs. BBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORA drawdown since its inception was -73.96%, smaller than the maximum BBW drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORA and BBW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORABBWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.96%

-97.24%

+23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.99%

-59.86%

+24.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.99%

-59.86%

+24.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.21%

-59.86%

+18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.39%

-93.40%

+41.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.75%

-54.37%

+21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-59.67%

+29.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.31%

37.53%

-26.22%

Volatility

ORA vs. BBW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ormat Technologies, Inc. (ORA) is 10.63%, while Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) has a volatility of 14.50%. This indicates that ORA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORABBWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

14.50%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.92%

32.09%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.97%

51.89%

-18.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.52%

55.31%

-23.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.47%

65.99%

-33.52%

Dividends

ORA vs. BBW - Dividend Comparison

ORA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BBW's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBW
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
2.65%1.44%1.74%6.52%0.00%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ORA
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
0.49%0.43%0.71%0.63%0.56%0.61%0.49%0.59%1.01%0.91%0.97%0.71%

Financials

ORA vs. BBW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ORA vs. BBW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ormat Technologies, Inc. and Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ORA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.37M and revenue of 403.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.

BBW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

ORA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.13M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.0%.

BBW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

ORA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ormat Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 44.07M and revenue of 403.91M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

BBW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ORA and BBW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBW has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to ORA (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORA dropped -73.96% vs BBW's -97.24%.

ORA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORA and BBW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer