PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORA.TO vs. NBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aura Minerals Inc. (ORA.TO) and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ORA.TO is traded in CAD, while NBIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NBIX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


ORA.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIX

1D
7.07%
1M
25.61%
YTD
17.90%
6M
8.23%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ORA.TO
Aura Minerals Inc.
0.00%173.17%103.33%22.50%-21.12%-20.62%764.03%40.82%-24.90%57.66%
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
17.90%-0.86%12.50%7.88%50.23%-11.95%-12.34%43.13%-0.16%87.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ORA.TO and NBIX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ORA.TO:

CA$3.46B

NBIX:

$17.07B

EPS

ORA.TO:

-CA$0.80

NBIX:

$6.53

PS Ratio

ORA.TO:

5.08

NBIX:

5.45

PB Ratio

ORA.TO:

24.73

NBIX:

5.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

ORA.TO:

CA$679.91M

NBIX:

$3.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ORA.TO:

CA$335.65M

NBIX:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

ORA.TO:

CA$127.50M

NBIX:

$881.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORA.TO vs. NBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORA.TO

NBIX
NBIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aura Minerals Inc. (ORA.TO) and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORA.TONBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORA.TONBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

Volatility

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORA.TONBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.93%

Dividends

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Dividend Comparison

ORA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while NBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ORA.TO
Aura Minerals Inc.
1.00%3.00%4.63%5.63%4.67%14.10%0.00%3.57%

Financials

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aura Minerals Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
190.44M
814.50M
(ORA.TO) Total Revenue
(NBIX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ORA.TO values in CAD, NBIX values in USD

ORA.TO vs. NBIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aura Minerals Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
54.6%
98.3%
Portfolio components
ORA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 103.94M and revenue of 190.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

NBIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.70M and revenue of 814.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.3%.

ORA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 90.94M and revenue of 190.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.8%.

NBIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 193.40M and revenue of 814.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.

ORA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 8.15M and revenue of 190.44M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

NBIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. reported a net income of 197.90M and revenue of 814.50M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ORA.TO and NBIX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORA.TO and NBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer