PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTZ vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPTZ vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTZ achieves a 31.19% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 6.62% return.


OPTZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.07%
YTD
31.19%
6M
31.66%
1Y
61.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PWC

1D
0.73%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.60%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTZ vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
31.19%22.83%16.81%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
6.62%6.15%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTZ and PWC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024

0.63

The correlation between OPTZ and PWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

OPTZ vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OPTZ
PWC

Technology

50.6%
26.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
11.5%

Financial Services

9.1%
14.0%

Industrials

8.9%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.0%

Energy

1.5%
5.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
5.6%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.5%

Utilities

0.7%
2.7%

Technology

OPTZ
50.6%
PWC
26.1%

Healthcare

OPTZ
10.5%
PWC
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

OPTZ
9.5%
PWC
11.5%

Financial Services

OPTZ
9.1%
PWC
14.0%

Industrials

OPTZ
8.9%
PWC
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

OPTZ
4.0%
PWC
6.8%

Communication Services

OPTZ
2.6%
PWC
7.0%

Energy

OPTZ
1.5%
PWC
5.5%

Real Estate

OPTZ
1.5%
PWC
5.6%

Basic Materials

OPTZ
1.3%
PWC
3.5%

Utilities

OPTZ
0.7%
PWC
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPTZ vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTZ vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPTZPWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.18

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.77

1.56

+4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.24

4.78

+21.46

OPTZ vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTZ and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPTZPWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

1.03

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.11

+1.59

Drawdowns

OPTZ vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTZ drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTZ and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTZPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-78.13%

+52.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-6.45%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.65%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-36.20%

+32.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.10%

+0.23%

Volatility

OPTZ vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.26%. This indicates that OPTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPTZPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

2.26%

+3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

7.21%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

9.77%

+8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.64%

16.07%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

18.81%

+1.83%

OPTZ vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPTZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPTZ vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

OPTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than PWC's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.44%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.67%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPTZ and PWC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTZ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to PWC (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTZ dropped -25.75% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 61.03% vs 10.03% for PWC. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 61.03% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.44% for OPTZ.

OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Optimize and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OPTZ and 0.60% for PWC.

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPTZ and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer