PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTU vs. AEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OPTU vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTU achieves a -24.24% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's -1.16% return.


OPTU

1D
8.70%
1M
89.08%
YTD
-24.24%
6M
-28.16%
1Y
-37.19%
3Y*
-16.28%
5Y*
-48.34%
10Y*

AEM

1D
0.11%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-6.98%
1Y
39.16%
3Y*
53.19%
5Y*
24.66%
10Y*
14.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTU vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPTU
Optimum Communications, Inc
-24.24%-31.54%-25.85%-29.35%-71.57%-57.27%38.51%65.50%-3.98%-32.82%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-1.16%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTU and AEM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OPTU:

$590.53M

AEM:

$83.71B

EPS

OPTU:

-$9.97

AEM:

$10.60

PS Ratio

OPTU:

0.07

AEM:

6.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

OPTU:

$8.50B

AEM:

$13.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OPTU:

$5.50B

AEM:

$8.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

OPTU:

$3.29B

AEM:

$9.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPTU vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTU
OPTU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OPTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTU vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPTUAEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.18

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

1.00

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

2.69

-3.60

OPTU vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTU and AEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPTU vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTU drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than AEM's maximum drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTU and AEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTUAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.40%

-90.49%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.51%

-39.39%

-40.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.39%

-39.39%

-44.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.27%

-41.97%

-56.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.70%

-33.68%

-63.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-46.64%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.91%

14.62%

+26.29%

Volatility

OPTU vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) has a higher volatility of 62.06% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 15.34%. This indicates that OPTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPTUAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

62.06%

15.34%

+46.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.64%

36.50%

+40.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.10%

44.59%

+58.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.74%

37.08%

+44.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.16%

37.41%

+28.75%

Dividends

OPTU vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

OPTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.02%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
OPTU
Optimum Communications, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OPTU vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Optimum Communications, Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.07B
4.10B
(OPTU) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OPTU and AEM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTU has higher volatility (62.06%) compared to AEM (15.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTU dropped -98.40% vs AEM's -90.49%.

AEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPTU and AEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer