PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPTU vs. NG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OPTU vs. NG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) and NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPTU achieves a -35.76% return, which is significantly lower than NG's -10.09% return.


OPTU

1D
-8.62%
1M
-33.75%
YTD
-35.76%
6M
-42.70%
1Y
-52.47%
3Y*
-26.13%
5Y*
-49.94%
10Y*

NG

1D
0.60%
1M
4.10%
YTD
-10.09%
6M
-15.52%
1Y
123.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
-3.78%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPTU vs. NG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPTU
Optimum Communications, Inc
-35.76%-31.54%-25.85%-29.35%-71.57%-57.27%38.51%65.50%-3.98%-35.10%
NG
NovaGold Resources Inc.
-10.09%179.88%-10.96%-37.46%-12.83%-29.06%7.92%126.84%0.51%-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OPTU and NG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OPTU:

$500.77M

NG:

$3.48B

EPS

OPTU:

-$9.97

NG:

-$0.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

OPTU:

$8.50B

NG:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

OPTU:

$5.50B

NG:

-$19.45K

EBITDA (TTM)

OPTU:

$3.29B

NG:

-$56.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPTU vs. NG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPTU
OPTU Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
OPTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NG
NG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPTU vs. NG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) and NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPTUNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

1.62

-2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

2.22

-2.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.29

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

2.94

-3.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.40

6.50

-7.90

OPTU vs. NG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the NG Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPTU and NG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPTUNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.62

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

-0.06

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.05

-0.51

Drawdowns

OPTU vs. NG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPTU drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, roughly equal to the maximum NG drawdown of -97.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPTU and NG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPTUNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.40%

-97.85%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.51%

-45.56%

-33.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.39%

-57.38%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.29%

-77.69%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.20%

-50.95%

-46.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.64%

-58.04%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.64%

20.62%

+18.02%

Volatility

OPTU vs. NG - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Communications, Inc (OPTU) has a higher volatility of 66.83% compared to NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) at 21.51%. This indicates that OPTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPTUNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.83%

21.51%

+45.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.20%

59.38%

+15.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.88%

76.73%

+25.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.32%

59.42%

+21.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.06%

55.81%

+10.25%

Dividends

OPTU vs. NG - Dividend Comparison

Neither OPTU nor NG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NG
NovaGold Resources Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OPTU
Optimum Communications, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.64%

Financials

OPTU vs. NG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Optimum Communications, Inc and NovaGold Resources Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.07B
0
(OPTU) Total Revenue
(NG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OPTU and NG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTU has higher volatility (66.83%) compared to NG (21.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPTU dropped -98.40% vs NG's -97.85%.

NG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPTU and NG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer