OOSP vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OOSP returned 6.13% vs 47.83% for GSIB. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. OOSP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

OOSP vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOSP achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.98% return.

OOSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOSP vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	2.31%	7.41%	6.27%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between OOSP and GSIB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

OOSP vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOSP

OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 75
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 71
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOSP vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OOSP	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.59	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	3.58	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.43	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.89	3.28	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	11.54	+6.52

OOSP vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSP and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OOSP vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSP drawdown since its inception was -1.31%, smaller than the maximum GSIB drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSP and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	OOSP	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-17.71%	+16.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.31%	-13.90%	+12.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.20%	-2.05%	+1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	3.94%	-3.59%

Volatility

OOSP vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) is 0.82%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that OOSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OOSP	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	5.59%	-4.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.17%	14.41%	-12.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.67%	17.63%	-13.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	18.51%	-15.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	18.51%	-15.18%

OOSP vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

OOSP vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	6.48%	6.71%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OOSP and GSIB in my portfolio?

OOSP and GSIB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OOSP or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to OOSP (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSP dropped -1.31% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, OOSP or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 6.13% for OOSP. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OOSP or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OOSP or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OOSP or GSIB?

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between OOSP and GSIB?

OOSP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Obra and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for OOSP and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.