PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOSP vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OOSP vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OOSP vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
0.96%7.41%6.43%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
0.94%5.44%4.98%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OOSP having a 0.96% return and CLOA slightly lower at 0.94%.


OOSP

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
0.96%
6M
2.56%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.27%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OOSP vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OOSP vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOSP vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OOSPCLOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

3.34

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

4.54

-2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

2.22

-0.88

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

5.01

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.23

36.22

-21.99

OOSP vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSP and CLOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OOSPCLOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

3.34

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.28

5.12

-2.84

Correlation

The correlation between OOSP and CLOA is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

OOSP vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than CLOA's 5.21% yield.


TTM202520242023
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.58%6.71%5.42%0.00%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
5.21%5.35%6.01%5.88%

Drawdowns

OOSP vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSP drawdown since its inception was -1.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CLOA drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSP and CLOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OOSPCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-1.34%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-1.10%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.04%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-0.06%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.15%

+0.28%

Volatility

OOSP vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.27%. This indicates that OOSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OOSPCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

0.27%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

0.51%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

1.64%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

1.35%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.34%

1.35%

+1.99%