PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOSP vs. EWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OOSP vs. EWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOSP achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 5.96% return.


OOSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.41%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EWS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.24%
YTD
5.96%
6M
7.68%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOSP vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
2.31%7.41%6.27%
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
5.96%31.35%22.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OOSP and EWS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OOSP vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOSP vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OOSPEWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

2.24

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.06

5.40

+12.65

OOSP vs. EWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the EWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOSP and EWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OOSP vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOSP drawdown since its inception was -1.31%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOSP and EWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OOSPEWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-75.13%

+73.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-7.82%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-2.77%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-21.98%

+21.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

3.23%

-2.88%

Volatility

OOSP vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) is 0.82%, while iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that OOSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OOSPEWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

5.05%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

12.11%

-9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

15.24%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.33%

17.34%

-14.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

18.04%

-14.71%

OOSP vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOSP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

OOSP vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison

OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than EWS's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.87%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.48%6.71%5.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OOSP and EWS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWS has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to OOSP (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOSP dropped -1.31% vs EWS's -75.13%.

On 1-year performance, EWS leads with 18.15% vs 6.13% for OOSP. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EWS has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 3.87% for EWS.

OOSP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while EWS is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Obra and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for OOSP and 0.50% for EWS.

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OOSP and EWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer