OOQB vs. BOEG
OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) and BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BOEG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
OOQB vs. BOEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than BOEG's -14.18% return.
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOEG
- 1D
- -6.30%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB vs. BOEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -18.43% | -9.48% |
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -14.18% | 6.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between OOQB and BOEG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OOQB vs. BOEG — Risk / Return Rank
OOQB
BOEG
OOQB vs. BOEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OOQB | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OOQB | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -0.14 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
OOQB vs. BOEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, which is greater than BOEG's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and BOEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OOQB | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.44% | -46.47% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.69% | -35.57% | -8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -19.06% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.11% | — | — |
Volatility
OOQB vs. BOEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OOQB | BOEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.57% | 63.38% | -11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.12% | 63.38% | -5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.12% | 63.38% | -5.26% |
OOQB vs. BOEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OOQB and BOEG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
OOQB vs. BOEG - Dividend Comparison
OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, while BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OOQB and BOEG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OOQB and BOEG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.
OOQB is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BOEG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Leverage Shares.
Find the right allocation for OOQB and BOEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer