OOQB vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OOQB returned -27.35% vs 2.93% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. OOQB charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

OOQB vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.06% return.

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OOQB vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.06%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between OOQB and BAMU is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

OOQB vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOQB vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OOQB	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	4.98	-5.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	8.77	-9.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	2.41	-1.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	24.89	-25.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	97.89	-98.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OOQB vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOQB Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOQB and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OOQB	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	4.98	-5.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	4.14	-4.55

Drawdowns

OOQB vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OOQB	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.44%	-0.36%	-53.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.44%	-0.12%	-53.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.69%	0.00%	-43.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.26%	-0.02%	-23.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.11%	0.03%	+30.08%

Volatility

OOQB vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) is 0.00%, while Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) has a volatility of 0.07%. This indicates that OOQB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OOQB	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.07%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.39%	0.43%	+38.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.57%	0.59%	+50.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.12%	0.87%	+57.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.12%	0.87%	+57.25%

OOQB vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

OOQB vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OOQB and BAMU in my portfolio?

OOQB and BAMU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OOQB or BAMU?

BAMU has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OOQB dropped -53.44% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, OOQB or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.93% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OOQB or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.93% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OOQB or BAMU?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OOQB or BAMU?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 3.06% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between OOQB and BAMU?

OOQB is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OOQB and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.