ONLN vs. SQQQ
ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -7.66%/yr vs -46.89%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONLN achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return.
ONLN
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -8.58% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.66% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | 35.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONLN and SQQQ is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018 | -0.75 |
The correlation between ONLN and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.75 (all time) to -0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONLN
SQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ONLN
SQQQ
-
Technology
ONLN
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
ONLN
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
ONLN
-
SQQQ
Healthcare
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
ONLN
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONLN vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ONLN
SQQQ
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONLN | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.78 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | -0.96 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | -1.81 | +3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONLN | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.77% | -100.00% | +28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -63.52% | +43.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -92.51% | +64.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.19% | -97.27% | +28.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.80% | -100.00% | +59.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.45% | -92.73% | +57.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 36.37% | -28.02% |
Volatility
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) is 7.48%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.69%. This indicates that ONLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONLN | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 26.69% | -19.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 43.33% | -25.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 53.65% | -29.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 67.53% | -34.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.08% | 66.47% | -34.39% |
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONLN vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONLN and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to ONLN (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -7.66% vs -46.89% for SQQQ. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, ONLN has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -7.66% return vs -46.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 0.36% for ONLN.
ONLN is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.95% for SQQQ.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONLN and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer