ONEO vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEO returned 11.86%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for VONG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

ONEO vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 11.86%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.

ONEO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 17.96%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 28.01%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

VONG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 7.40%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 25.06%
• 5Y*: 15.42%
• 10Y*: 18.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.96%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	21.16%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	7.40%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and VONG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015	0.73

The correlation between ONEO and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEO vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEO	VONG
Technology	21.9%	51.4%
Industrials	18.0%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	13.2%
Healthcare	9.5%	7.1%
Financial Services	9.4%	5.3%
Energy	7.3%	0.4%
Utilities	5.8%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.6%	13.2%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.4%

Return for Risk

ONEO vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 72
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 42
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEO	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.67	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.28	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.29	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	1.58	+2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.14	5.29	+9.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEO vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEO	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	1.67	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.73	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.89	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.90	-0.27

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEO	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.86%	-32.72%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-16.23%	+8.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-23.27%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-32.72%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.86%	-32.72%	-8.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.46%	+1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-4.88%	-0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	4.84%	-2.98%

Volatility

ONEO vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEO	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	3.59%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	11.61%	-1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	15.36%	-2.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	21.33%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	20.87%	-2.21%

ONEO vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEO vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEO and VONG in my portfolio?

ONEO and VONG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEO or VONG?

ONEO has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to VONG (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, ONEO or VONG?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.60% vs 11.86% for ONEO. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEO or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEO or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEO or VONG?

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.43% for VONG.

What is the main difference between ONEO and VONG?

ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.