ONEY vs. IWS
ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ONEY tracks the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEY returned 12.19%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
ONEY vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 12.19%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
ONEY
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
IWS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
ONEY vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF | 14.15% | 7.74% | 11.63% | 11.12% | -3.60% | 37.11% | 2.17% | 27.45% | -8.71% | 15.46% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.78% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEY and IWS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ONEY and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEY vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEY
IWS
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
ONEY
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
ONEY
IWS
Energy
ONEY
IWS
Consumer Defensive
ONEY
IWS
Utilities
ONEY
IWS
Financial Services
ONEY
IWS
Real Estate
ONEY
IWS
Basic Materials
ONEY
IWS
Technology
ONEY
IWS
Healthcare
ONEY
IWS
Communication Services
ONEY
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEY vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
ONEY
IWS
ONEY vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.57 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 13.39 | -2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEY vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.80% | -62.40% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.61% | -7.53% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.50% | -20.57% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | -21.23% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | -43.83% | -2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -1.24% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -8.00% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility
ONEY vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 3.50%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 4.37% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 10.12% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 13.57% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 17.33% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 19.35% | +0.53% |
ONEY vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEY vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.18% | 3.14% | 3.17% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.72% | 10.73% | 6.31% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEY and IWS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to ONEY (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.19% vs 10.56% for IWS. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.
ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEY and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer