PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEY vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEY vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEY has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 12.04%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


ONEY

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.52%
YTD
14.26%
6M
14.38%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
12.04%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
14.26%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and GLD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.06

The correlation between ONEY and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEY vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEY
GLD

Industrials

13.9%

-

Energy

13.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Utilities

10.6%

-

Financial Services

10.2%

-

Real Estate

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

8.2%
100.0%

Technology

4.8%

-

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Industrials

ONEY
13.9%
GLD

-

Energy

ONEY
13.2%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

ONEY
12.2%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

ONEY
11.8%
GLD

-

Utilities

ONEY
10.6%
GLD

-

Financial Services

ONEY
10.2%
GLD

-

Real Estate

ONEY
9.7%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

ONEY
8.2%
GLD
100.0%

Technology

ONEY
4.8%
GLD

-

Healthcare

ONEY
3.8%
GLD

-

Communication Services

ONEY
1.6%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEY vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEYGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.68

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

4.15

+7.00

ONEY vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEYGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.21

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.01

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.60

+0.02

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEYGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.80%

-45.56%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-19.21%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-19.21%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-21.03%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-22.00%

-24.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-17.75%

+17.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-16.16%

+11.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

7.73%

-5.62%

Volatility

ONEY vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) is 2.78%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that ONEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEYGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

5.51%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

23.16%

-14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

26.61%

-14.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

18.00%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

15.95%

+3.92%

ONEY vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEY vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.81%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEY and GLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to ONEY (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 12.04% for ONEY. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

ONEY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GLD is Gold. ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.40% for GLD.

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEY and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer