PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.29% return.


ONEV

1D
0.20%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.47%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
11.19%

VSMV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.79%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEV vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
6.31%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%9.89%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.29%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and VSMV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.80

The correlation between ONEV and VSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEV vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
VSMV

Industrials

19.5%
8.5%

Healthcare

13.9%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
5.0%

Financial Services

12.1%
8.1%

Technology

11.0%
34.4%

Utilities

8.9%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
17.6%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.4%

Energy

1.6%
4.4%

Industrials

ONEV
19.5%
VSMV
8.5%

Healthcare

ONEV
13.9%
VSMV
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
12.7%
VSMV
5.0%

Financial Services

ONEV
12.1%
VSMV
8.1%

Technology

ONEV
11.0%
VSMV
34.4%

Utilities

ONEV
8.9%
VSMV
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
8.5%
VSMV
17.6%

Real Estate

ONEV
5.2%
VSMV
0.0%

Basic Materials

ONEV
4.0%
VSMV
1.8%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.6%
VSMV
5.4%

Energy

ONEV
1.6%
VSMV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEV vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEVVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.49

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.74

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

18.09

-12.75

ONEV vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEVVSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.71

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.89

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.82

-0.15

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than VSMV's maximum drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-31.33%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-5.18%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-13.22%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-17.96%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.79%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-3.41%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

1.36%

+0.91%

Volatility

ONEV vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.41%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.41%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

6.34%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

9.08%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

12.86%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.04%

+1.98%

ONEV vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEV vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.76%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEV and VSMV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to VSMV (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs 7.83% for ONEV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

ONEV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer