PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 11.48%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.


ONEV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.98%
6M
8.95%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.48%
ALL TIME*
11.73%

SPYM

1D
1.47%
1M
1.73%
6M
9.55%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.21%
ALL TIME*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$449.28K$3.31M$4.48M
$833.33M$955.26M$1.11B

ONEV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
12.96%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.77%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and SPYM is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between ONEV and SPYM has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ONEV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
SPYM

Industrials

17.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

17.0%
11.6%

Healthcare

12.3%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
4.5%

Technology

8.3%
38.5%

Real Estate

8.3%
1.8%

Utilities

8.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.9%

Energy

2.3%
3.0%

Industrials

ONEV
17.7%
SPYM
8.4%

Financial Services

ONEV
17.0%
SPYM
11.6%

Healthcare

ONEV
12.3%
SPYM
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
11.3%
SPYM
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
9.1%
SPYM
4.5%

Technology

ONEV
8.3%
SPYM
38.5%

Real Estate

ONEV
8.3%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

ONEV
8.2%
SPYM
2.2%

Basic Materials

ONEV
2.7%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.7%
SPYM
9.9%

Energy

ONEV
2.3%
SPYM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.63

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.28

11.23

-2.95

ONEV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-54.46%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-18.72%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-24.48%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-33.87%

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

0.00%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-7.11%

+3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.08%

+0.16%

Volatility

ONEV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.76%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.76%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

10.18%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

12.81%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

16.94%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

18.02%

-0.99%

ONEV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.79%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEV has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SPYM (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.21% vs 11.48% for ONEV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEV.

ONEV has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.

ONEV is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPYM is S&P 500. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer