ONEV vs. ONEQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).

ONEV and ONEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ONEV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003. Both ONEV and ONEQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	1.58%	8.14%	11.76%	13.28%	-8.15%	29.19%	6.66%	30.66%	-5.30%	18.11%
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	-5.66%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 10.85%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.

ONEV

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -5.39%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 8.22%
• 3Y*: 10.52%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

ONEQ

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -3.69%
• YTD: -5.66%
• 6M: -3.52%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 22.37%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 17.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ONEQ

Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock

ONEV

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF

Return for Risk

ONEV vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEV

ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 29
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 33

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEV	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.14	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	1.75	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.08	-1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	7.64	-4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEV	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	1.14	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.51	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.80	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.61	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and ONEQ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than ONEQ's 0.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	1.84%	1.81%	1.88%	1.79%	1.80%	1.44%	1.87%	2.07%	2.14%	6.91%	3.73%	0.21%
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	0.82%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEV	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-55.09%	+15.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.78%	-13.13%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-35.23%	+16.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.72%	-35.23%	-4.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-8.26%	+2.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-8.01%	+4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	3.57%	-0.91%

Volatility

ONEV vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 3.78%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEV	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	7.03%	-3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	12.96%	-4.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.77%	23.24%	-8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.58%	22.16%	-7.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	21.67%	-4.68%