PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. XLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. XLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed XLI with an annualized return of 18.71%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.76% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.41%
6M
9.45%
YTD
10.72%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
18.71%
ALL TIME*
13.35%

XLI

1D
-0.72%
1M
-1.30%
6M
7.29%
YTD
15.43%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
13.76%
ALL TIME*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
10.72%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
15.43%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and XLI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.73

The correlation between ONEQ and XLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEQ vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEQ
XLI

Technology

53.3%
6.3%

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
0.2%

Industrials

5.7%
93.3%

Healthcare

5.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Financial Services

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%
0.1%

Utilities

0.8%
5.3%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Technology

ONEQ
53.3%
XLI
6.3%

Communication Services

ONEQ
14.3%
XLI

-

Consumer Cyclical

ONEQ
11.9%
XLI
0.2%

Industrials

ONEQ
5.7%
XLI
93.3%

Healthcare

ONEQ
5.1%
XLI

-

Consumer Defensive

ONEQ
4.3%
XLI

-

Financial Services

ONEQ
2.8%
XLI

-

Basic Materials

ONEQ
0.9%
XLI
0.1%

Utilities

ONEQ
0.8%
XLI
5.3%

Real Estate

ONEQ
0.6%
XLI

-

Energy

ONEQ
0.5%
XLI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQXLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.57

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

6.09

+0.55

ONEQ vs. XLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the XLI Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and XLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and XLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQXLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-62.26%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-12.21%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-18.49%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-21.64%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-42.33%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-4.01%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-9.17%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.15%

+0.38%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 5.03%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQXLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

5.03%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

13.80%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

16.68%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

17.53%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

20.01%

+1.78%

ONEQ vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.87%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.16%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEQ and XLI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to XLI (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs XLI's -62.26%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 18.71% vs 13.76% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 18.71% return vs 13.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.87% for ONEQ.

ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.08% for XLI.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and XLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer