ONEQ vs. SWPPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both funds - ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index, while SWPPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ returned 19.68%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SWPPX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.

Performance

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 19.68%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.63% annualized return.

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

SWPPX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 5.83%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	11.69%	17.87%	24.96%	26.26%	-18.14%	28.67%	18.38%	31.46%	-4.47%	21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and SWPPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003	0.91

The correlation between ONEQ and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEQ	SWPPX
Technology	50.8%	35.6%
Communication Services	16.7%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.9%
Healthcare	5.1%	8.5%
Financial Services	3.1%	11.8%
Industrials	2.9%	8.3%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.8%
Utilities	0.9%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.9%
Energy	0.6%	3.5%

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SWPPX

SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEQ	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.52	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.41	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.36	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	15.67	-3.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEQ	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.52	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.85	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.86	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.51	+0.14

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and SWPPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	SWPPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-55.06%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-8.89%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-18.74%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-24.51%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-33.80%	-1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	0.00%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-9.95%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	1.90%	+1.29%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	SWPPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.83%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	8.98%	+2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	11.87%	+4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	16.93%	+5.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	18.23%	+3.48%

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than SWPPX's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	0.99%	1.11%	1.23%	1.43%	1.67%	1.27%	1.81%	1.95%	2.67%	1.79%	2.55%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEQ and SWPPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ONEQ and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ONEQ or SWPPX?

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SWPPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.