PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. ARKK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed ARKK with an annualized return of 18.60%, while ARKK has yielded a comparatively lower 14.33% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
2.04%
1M
0.40%
6M
10.70%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
18.60%
ALL TIME*
13.40%

ARKK

1D
3.23%
1M
-9.49%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
-4.39%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
-9.57%
10Y*
14.33%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$370.97M$374.79M$521.18M
$34.83M$32.03M$39.48M

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
12.39%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
-4.39%35.49%8.40%69.04%-66.97%-23.60%152.71%35.08%3.52%87.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and ARKK is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.77

The correlation between ONEQ and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEQ
ARKK

Technology

53.3%
25.8%

Communication Services

14.3%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
13.0%

Industrials

5.7%
9.4%

Healthcare

5.1%
32.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Financial Services

2.8%
12.8%

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Technology

ONEQ
53.3%
ARKK
25.8%

Communication Services

ONEQ
14.3%
ARKK
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEQ
11.9%
ARKK
13.0%

Industrials

ONEQ
5.7%
ARKK
9.4%

Healthcare

ONEQ
5.1%
ARKK
32.0%

Consumer Defensive

ONEQ
4.3%
ARKK

-

Financial Services

ONEQ
2.8%
ARKK
12.8%

Basic Materials

ONEQ
0.9%
ARKK

-

Utilities

ONEQ
0.8%
ARKK

-

Real Estate

ONEQ
0.6%
ARKK

-

Energy

ONEQ
0.5%
ARKK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQARKKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.04

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.11

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

0.21

+6.93

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and ARKK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQARKKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-80.97%

+25.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-31.35%

+18.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-39.56%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-76.27%

+41.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-80.97%

+45.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-52.38%

+48.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-30.39%

+22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

15.61%

-11.83%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) is 6.04%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that ONEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQARKKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

10.89%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

27.68%

-13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

36.62%

-18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

46.59%

-24.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

40.50%

-18.67%

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.86%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEQ and ARKK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKK has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to ONEQ (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs ARKK's -80.97%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 18.60% vs 14.33% for ARKK. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.

ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.75% for ARKK.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and ARKK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer