PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 20.35% return.


ONEO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
13.71%
YTD
18.39%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
11.59%

USVM

1D
0.17%
1M
1.10%
6M
15.01%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
18.39%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%5.28%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
20.35%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and USVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.92

The correlation between ONEO and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
USVM

Technology

25.6%
8.7%

Industrials

17.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
12.8%

Financial Services

8.8%
25.1%

Energy

6.5%
5.1%

Utilities

5.4%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
9.6%

Technology

ONEO
25.6%
USVM
8.7%

Industrials

ONEO
17.1%
USVM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.3%
USVM
12.3%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.4%
USVM
12.8%

Financial Services

ONEO
8.8%
USVM
25.1%

Energy

ONEO
6.5%
USVM
5.1%

Utilities

ONEO
5.4%
USVM
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.0%
USVM
3.7%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
USVM
1.7%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.5%
USVM
3.0%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.8%
USVM
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEOUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.64

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

13.77

-1.23

ONEO vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, roughly equal to the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-42.38%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.36%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-24.34%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-25.27%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.75%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-7.81%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.21%

-0.33%

Volatility

ONEO vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 2.92%. This indicates that ONEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.92%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

10.85%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

14.80%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

19.56%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

21.91%

-3.30%

ONEO vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEO vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than USVM's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.19%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.83%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and USVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEO has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to USVM (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.48% vs 10.90% for ONEO. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.19% for ONEO.

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer