ONEO vs. ULVM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEO returned 10.52%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for ULVM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

ONEO vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 15.73% return.

ONEO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 17.96%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 28.01%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

ULVM

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 30.22%
• 3Y*: 21.62%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.96%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	5.15%
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	15.73%	15.84%	19.76%	10.16%	-9.04%	31.06%	3.51%	22.08%	-12.07%	4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and ULVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.96

The correlation between ONEO and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEO	ULVM
Technology	21.9%	13.1%
Industrials	18.0%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	5.3%
Healthcare	9.5%	10.1%
Financial Services	9.4%	22.5%
Energy	7.3%	3.4%
Utilities	5.8%	12.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	4.1%
Communication Services	3.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	2.9%	8.7%

Return for Risk

ONEO vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 72
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

ULVM

ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 87
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEO	ULVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.83	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.96	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.49	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	4.69	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.14	19.45	-4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEO vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEO	ULVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.83	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.75	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.58	+0.05

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, roughly equal to the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and ULVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEO	ULVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.86%	-40.71%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-6.47%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-18.14%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-19.77%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-5.75%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.56%	+0.30%

Volatility

ONEO vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.97%. This indicates that ONEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEO	ULVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	2.97%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	7.99%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	10.75%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	15.48%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	18.85%	-0.19%

ONEO vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEO and ULVM have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEO vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than ULVM's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	1.56%	1.81%	1.57%	1.94%	1.91%	1.36%	1.51%	1.88%	1.67%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEO and ULVM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ONEO and ULVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ONEO or ULVM?

ONEO has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to ULVM (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

Which ETF is better, ONEO or ULVM?

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.61% vs 10.52% for ONEO. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEO or ULVM?

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEO or ULVM?

ONEO and ULVM have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEO or ULVM?

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

What is the main difference between ONEO and ULVM?

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.