ONEO vs. SMOM
ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. ONEO is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
ONEO vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 6.85% return.
ONEO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
SMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEO vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 17.68% | 1.46% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 6.85% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEO and SMOM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEO vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
ONEO
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ONEO vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEO vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.86% | -7.45% | -33.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.70% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.50% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility
ONEO vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 12.77% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 12.77% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 12.77% | +5.92% |
ONEO vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEO vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.73% | 1.19% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 7.69% | 1.82% | 0.17% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEO and SMOM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for ONEO and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer