OMFS vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OMFS returned 14.20%/yr vs -31.71%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. OMFS charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

OMFS vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.

OMFS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.56%
• 6M: 12.48%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 1Y: 30.87%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 36.51%
• YTD: 24.73%
• 1Y: 64.56%
• 3Y*: -31.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFS vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	20.25%	13.34%	3.98%	15.12%	5.65%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.73%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFS and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.37

Return for Risk

OMFS vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 73
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 65
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFS vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMFS	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.47	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.04	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.25	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	2.57	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	6.36	+5.04

OMFS vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFS and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFS	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-92.16%	+49.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-25.28%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.35%	-84.63%	+62.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-86.38%	+85.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.35%	-68.42%	+58.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	10.18%	-7.46%

Volatility

OMFS vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is 3.34%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that OMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFS	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	10.69%	-7.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	34.09%	-21.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	44.07%	-26.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	52.21%	-30.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.19%	52.21%	-28.02%

OMFS vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFS vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BITI's 15.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.59%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.08%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFS and BITI in my portfolio?

OMFS and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMFS or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to OMFS (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, OMFS or BITI?

On 3-year performance, OMFS leads with 14.20% vs -31.71% for BITI. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFS or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, OMFS has performed better with a 14.20% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFS or BITI?

OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFS or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 1.08% for OMFS.

What is the main difference between OMFS and BITI?

OMFS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.