OMFL vs. AGZD
OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 9.27%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for AGZD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
OMFL vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than AGZD's 2.22% return.
OMFL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
OMFL vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 12.39% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 28.95% | 20.91% | 35.58% | -2.55% | 4.95% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.22% | 4.35% | 6.64% | 7.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.31% | 4.65% | 0.18% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and AGZD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFL vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
OMFL
AGZD
OMFL vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMFL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 6.09 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 19.08 | -5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMFL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.83 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.21 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.64 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -8.46% | -24.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -0.87% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -1.71% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -2.23% | -20.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.39% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -0.77% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.28% | +1.40% |
Volatility
OMFL vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.03%. This indicates that OMFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 1.03% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 1.99% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 2.89% | +9.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 3.59% | +13.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 3.72% | +16.39% |
OMFL vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFL vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMFL and AGZD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMFL has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs AGZD's -8.46%.
On 5-year performance, OMFL leads with 9.27% vs 4.32% for AGZD. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OMFL has performed better with a 9.27% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.
AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.
OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while AGZD tracks Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.23% for AGZD.
OMFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFL and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer