OMF vs. EOSE
OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) and EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) are both stocks. OMF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while EOSE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, OMF returned 8.86%/yr vs -21.15%/yr for EOSE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMF vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -12.84% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -47.12% return.
OMF
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- -12.84%
- 6M
- -14.45%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.73%
EOSE
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -22.95%
- YTD
- -47.12%
- 6M
- -59.16%
- 1Y
- 50.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- -21.15%
- 10Y*
- —
OMF vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -12.84% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.56% | 104.77% |
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | -47.12% | 135.80% | 345.87% | -26.35% | -80.32% | -63.92% | 112.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and EOSE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
OMF:
$6.65B
EOSE:
$3.30B
OMF:
$6.71
EOSE:
-$1.45
OMF:
1.36
EOSE:
12.40
OMF:
$4.94B
EOSE:
$160.71M
OMF:
$2.20B
EOSE:
-$163.73M
OMF:
$943.00M
EOSE:
-$858.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
EOSE
OMF vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMF | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.60 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMF vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, smaller than the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and EOSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -97.88% | +29.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -77.10% | +47.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -87.18% | +57.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -96.77% | +48.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.50% | -80.09% | +62.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.29% | -72.37% | +48.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.25% | 39.66% | -26.41% |
Volatility
OMF vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is 8.84%, while Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a volatility of 31.08%. This indicates that OMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.84% | 31.08% | -22.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.61% | 91.90% | -70.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.07% | 115.13% | -86.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.65% | 117.06% | -81.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.05% | 112.92% | -66.87% |
Dividends
OMF vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, while EOSE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 7.39% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% |
Financials
OMF vs. EOSE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OMF and EOSE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EOSE has higher volatility (31.08%) compared to OMF (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs EOSE's -97.88%.
OMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMF and EOSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer