EOSE vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, EOSE returned -16.36%/yr vs 67.87%/yr for VRT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EOSE vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOSE achieves a -35.95% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 121.05% return.

EOSE

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: -35.95%
• 6M: -43.06%
• 1Y: 63.47%
• 3Y*: 27.88%
• 5Y*: -16.36%
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: 9.34%
• YTD: 121.05%
• 6M: 115.41%
• 1Y: 202.31%
• 3Y*: 147.70%
• 5Y*: 67.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOSE vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc	-35.95%	135.80%	345.87%	-26.35%	-80.32%	-63.92%	112.65%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	121.05%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	38.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EOSE and VRT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020	0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap EOSE : $4.00B VRT : $140.37B
EPS EOSE : -$1.45 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio EOSE : 15.02 VRT : 12.91
Total Revenue (TTM) EOSE : $160.71M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) EOSE : -$163.73M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) EOSE : -$858.77M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

EOSE vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOSE

EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 63
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 95
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOSE vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EOSE	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	3.45	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	3.73	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.46	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	8.04	-7.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	21.32	-19.75

EOSE vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOSE and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EOSE vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOSE drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOSE and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOSE	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.88%	-71.24%	-26.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.10%	-25.32%	-51.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.18%	-61.28%	-25.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.60%	-71.24%	-25.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.89%	-4.83%	-71.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.38%	-16.22%	-56.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.62%	9.53%	+31.09%

Volatility

EOSE vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a higher volatility of 33.27% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 17.12%. This indicates that EOSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOSE	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.27%	17.12%	+16.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	91.29%	45.12%	+46.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.09%	59.08%	+56.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.27%	62.12%	+55.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.89%	54.70%	+58.19%

Dividends

EOSE vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

EOSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.06%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOSE and VRT in my portfolio?

EOSE and VRT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EOSE or VRT?

EOSE has higher volatility (33.27%) compared to VRT (17.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOSE dropped -97.88% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.