OMF vs. ASST
OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) and ASST (Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. OMF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while ASST operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, OMF returned 22.17%/yr vs -59.43%/yr for ASST. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMF vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly higher than ASST's -21.27% return.
OMF
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
ASST
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -34.24%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -24.88%
- 1Y
- -85.14%
- 3Y*
- -59.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMF vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -4.17% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 22.92% |
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | -21.27% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and ASST is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.14 |
The correlation between OMF and ASST shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMF:
$7.31B
ASST:
$716.14M
OMF:
$6.73
ASST:
-$19.16
OMF:
1.49
ASST:
72.97
OMF:
$4.94B
ASST:
$5.73M
OMF:
$2.20B
ASST:
-$7.43M
OMF:
$943.00M
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
ASST
OMF vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMF | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.93 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | -0.89 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | -1.06 | +2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMF vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, smaller than the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -98.78% | +30.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -95.98% | +66.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -97.25% | +67.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -98.02% | +88.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.25% | -90.48% | +66.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 80.34% | -66.77% |
Volatility
OMF vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is 8.55%, while Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) has a volatility of 25.82%. This indicates that OMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 25.82% | -17.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.59% | 81.19% | -59.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 162.89% | -133.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 320.82% | -285.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 320.82% | -274.96% |
Dividends
OMF vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, while ASST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 6.72% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% |
Financials
OMF vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OMF and ASST have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASST has higher volatility (25.82%) compared to OMF (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs ASST's -98.78%.
OMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMF and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer