ASST vs. ^GSPC
ASST (Strive, Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 3 years, ASST returned -53.43%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for ^GSPC. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ASST vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASST achieves a -24.73% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return.
ASST
- 1D
- -6.95%
- 1M
- -15.26%
- 6M
- -32.35%
- YTD
- -24.73%
- 1Y
- -81.61%
- 3Y*
- -53.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -67.95%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | $37.98T | $37.61T | $41.48T |
ASST Strive, Inc. | $33.59M | $35.42M | $61.63M |
ASST vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASST Strive, Inc. | -24.73% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.41% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 14.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASST and ^GSPC is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, ASST and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASST vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
ASST
^GSPC
ASST vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive, Inc. (ASST) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASST | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 2.00 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 8.49 | -9.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASST vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASST drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASST and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASST | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.78% | -56.78% | -42.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.98% | -9.10% | -86.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.25% | -18.90% | -78.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.11% | -1.58% | -96.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.68% | -10.70% | -79.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 83.80% | 2.14% | +81.66% |
Volatility
ASST vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Strive, Inc. (ASST) has a higher volatility of 23.26% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that ASST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASST | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.26% | 3.51% | +19.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.79% | 10.11% | +66.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.43% | 12.87% | +133.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 316.88% | 17.01% | +299.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 316.88% | 18.07% | +298.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASST and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASST has higher volatility (23.26%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASST dropped -98.78% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASST and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer