OMF vs. ARES
OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) and ARES (Ares Management Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — OMF in Credit Services, ARES in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, OMF returned 19.71%/yr vs 27.74%/yr for ARES. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMF vs. ARES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -31.41% return. Over the past 10 years, OMF has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 19.71%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 27.74% annualized return.
OMF
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
ARES
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -31.41%
- 6M
- -34.42%
- 1Y
- -34.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
OMF vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -4.17% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.56% | 34.53% | 88.37% | -6.54% | 17.39% |
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -31.41% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and ARES is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between OMF and ARES shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMF:
$6.73
ARES:
$2.82
OMF:
9.27
ARES:
38.10
OMF:
1.49
ARES:
3.76
OMF:
$4.94B
ARES:
$6.31B
OMF:
$2.20B
ARES:
$4.46B
OMF:
$943.00M
ARES:
$2.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
ARES
OMF vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMF | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.87 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | -0.71 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | -1.35 | +2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMF vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and ARES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -49.73% | -18.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -49.05% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -49.73% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -49.73% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | -49.73% | -18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -42.25% | +32.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.25% | -11.40% | -12.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 25.91% | -12.34% |
Volatility
OMF vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is 8.55%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 13.98%. This indicates that OMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 13.98% | -5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.59% | 36.10% | -14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 42.24% | -13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 37.59% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 36.53% | +9.33% |
Dividends
OMF vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than ARES's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 6.16% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 6.72% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OMF vs. ARES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OMF and ARES have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (13.98%) compared to OMF (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs ARES's -49.73%.
OMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMF and ARES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer