OMF vs. AOD
OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) and AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — OMF in Credit Services, AOD in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, OMF returned 19.71%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for AOD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
OMF vs. AOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly lower than AOD's 12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, OMF has outperformed AOD with an annualized return of 19.71%, while AOD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.
OMF
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
AOD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
OMF vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -4.17% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.56% | 34.53% | 88.37% | -6.54% | 17.39% |
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 12.61% | 32.14% | 16.03% | 12.65% | -17.15% | 23.80% | 8.12% | 34.83% | -17.63% | 35.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and AOD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015 | 0.52 |
The correlation between OMF and AOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMF:
$4.94B
AOD:
$93.67M
OMF:
$2.20B
AOD:
$252.71M
OMF:
$943.00M
AOD:
$55.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
AOD
OMF vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMF | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.39 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.00 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 8.59 | -7.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMF vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AOD drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and AOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -72.26% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -16.71% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -16.71% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -28.92% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | -43.68% | -24.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -1.78% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.25% | -27.20% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 3.89% | +9.68% |
Volatility
OMF vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison
OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) at 5.22%. This indicates that OMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | AOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 5.22% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.59% | 13.70% | +7.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 15.99% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 16.77% | +18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 18.52% | +27.34% |
Dividends
OMF vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than AOD's 11.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 11.81% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 6.75% | 7.80% | 7.71% | 9.57% | 7.29% | 9.10% | 8.93% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 6.72% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OMF vs. AOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OMF and AOD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMF has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to AOD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs AOD's -72.26%.
AOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMF and AOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer