AOD vs. DIV
AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) is a stock, while DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Over the past 10 years, AOD returned 13.28%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for DIV. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOD charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
AOD vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AOD has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 13.28%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
AOD
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
AOD vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 10.43% | 32.14% | 16.03% | 12.65% | -17.15% | 23.80% | 8.12% | 34.83% | -17.63% | 35.37% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOD and DIV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AOD and DIV has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOD vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
AOD
DIV
AOD vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.98 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.72 | 8.09 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOD vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.26% | -52.74% | -19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -5.23% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -12.33% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.92% | -21.14% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.68% | -52.74% | +9.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.67% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -7.01% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 1.92% | +1.95% |
Volatility
AOD vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.68%. This indicates that AOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOD | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 3.68% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 7.54% | +6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 10.64% | +5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 13.69% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 18.00% | +0.56% |
AOD vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOD vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than DIV's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund | 12.04% | 12.00% | 10.73% | 8.56% | 8.85% | 6.75% | 7.80% | 7.71% | 9.57% | 7.29% | 9.10% | 8.93% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOD and DIV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOD has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOD dropped -72.26% vs DIV's -52.74%.
AOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOD and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer