OMC vs. LECO
OMC (Omnicom Group Inc.) and LECO (Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. OMC operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while LECO operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, OMC returned 2.86%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for LECO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMC vs. LECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMC achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than LECO's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, OMC has underperformed LECO with an annualized return of 2.86%, while LECO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.79% annualized return.
OMC
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
LECO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 17.79%
OMC vs. LECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | -3.07% | -2.62% | 2.49% | 9.57% | 15.72% | 21.88% | -19.58% | 14.37% | 3.94% | -11.93% |
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | 8.12% | 29.63% | -12.55% | 52.61% | 5.42% | 21.89% | 22.97% | 25.41% | -12.24% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMC and LECO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 1995 | 0.37 |
The correlation between OMC and LECO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMC:
$0.51
LECO:
$9.68
OMC:
149.30
LECO:
26.67
OMC:
9.31
LECO:
1.16
OMC:
0.58
LECO:
3.30
OMC:
$19.82B
LECO:
$4.35B
OMC:
$3.45B
LECO:
$1.57B
OMC:
$1.14B
LECO:
$807.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMC vs. LECO — Risk / Return Rank
OMC
LECO
OMC vs. LECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.40 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 3.68 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMC vs. LECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMC drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum LECO drawdown of -68.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMC and LECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.22% | -68.89% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -20.09% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.30% | -34.29% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.30% | -34.29% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | -38.89% | -4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.40% | -13.31% | -9.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -13.51% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 7.64% | +0.23% |
Volatility
OMC vs. LECO - Volatility Comparison
Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) at 8.61%. This indicates that OMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 8.61% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.73% | 20.20% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.65% | 27.05% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 26.66% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 27.43% | +1.30% |
Dividends
OMC vs. LECO - Dividend Comparison
OMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than LECO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.21% | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.57% | 1.71% | 2.29% |
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. | 4.04% | 3.59% | 3.25% | 3.24% | 3.43% | 3.82% | 4.17% | 3.21% | 3.28% | 3.09% | 2.53% | 2.64% |
Financials
OMC vs. LECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Omnicom Group Inc. and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OMC vs. LECO - Profitability Comparison
OMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 6.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
LECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 399.13M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.
OMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported an operating income of 646.20M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
LECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.16M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
OMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Omnicom Group Inc. reported a net income of 418.70M and revenue of 6.24B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
LECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 136.38M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OMC and LECO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMC has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to LECO (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMC dropped -61.22% vs LECO's -68.89%.
LECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMC and LECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer