OLA.TO vs. CW
OLA.TO (Orla Mining Ltd.) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. OLA.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, OLA.TO returned 21.76%/yr vs 47.38%/yr for CW. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OLA.TO vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
OLA.TO is traded in CAD, while CW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLA.TO achieves a -19.10% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 40.48% return.
OLA.TO
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -25.15%
- YTD
- -19.10%
- 6M
- -17.03%
- 1Y
- -0.44%
- 3Y*
- 41.06%
- 5Y*
- 21.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CW
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 40.48%
- 6M
- 41.12%
- 1Y
- 63.89%
- 3Y*
- 65.58%
- 5Y*
- 47.38%
- 10Y*
- 26.21%
OLA.TO vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLA.TO Orla Mining Ltd. | -19.10% | 131.91% | 84.26% | -21.17% | 13.46% | -29.59% | 243.00% | 90.48% | -41.01% | 31.85% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 40.48% | 48.55% | 73.26% | 30.79% | 28.70% | 19.80% | -18.80% | 32.99% | -8.71% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between OLA.TO and CW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.12 |
The correlation between OLA.TO and CW shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OLA.TO:
CA$5.95B
CW:
$28.09B
OLA.TO:
CA$0.82
CW:
$13.64
OLA.TO:
18.13
CW:
55.58
OLA.TO:
0.29
CW:
3.03
OLA.TO:
3.56
CW:
7.88
OLA.TO:
5.64
CW:
10.67
OLA.TO:
CA$1.59B
CW:
$3.61B
OLA.TO:
CA$848.41M
CW:
$1.34B
OLA.TO:
CA$966.01M
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLA.TO vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
OLA.TO
CW
OLA.TO vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OLA.TO | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.31 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 4.96 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | 13.76 | -13.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OLA.TO vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLA.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.61%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLA.TO and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLA.TO | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.61% | -53.37% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.97% | -12.94% | -41.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.97% | -27.82% | -26.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | -27.82% | -26.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.72% | 0.00% | -49.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -15.42% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.42% | 4.66% | +16.76% |
Volatility
OLA.TO vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 10.41%. This indicates that OLA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OLA.TO | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.93% | 10.41% | +12.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.49% | 26.44% | +25.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.11% | 33.51% | +39.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.43% | 28.76% | +29.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.71% | 30.91% | +25.80% |
Dividends
OLA.TO vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
OLA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than CW's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
OLA.TO Orla Mining Ltd. | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OLA.TO vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orla Mining Ltd. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OLA.TO vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
OLA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a gross profit of 296.32M and revenue of 519.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.0%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
OLA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported an operating income of 274.55M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.8%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
OLA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a net income of 103.43M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OLA.TO and CW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OLA.TO and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer