OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX
Compare and contrast key facts about Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) and Catalyst Metals Limited (CYL.AX).
Performance
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLA.TO Orla Mining Ltd. | 21.31% | 131.91% | 84.26% | -21.17% | 13.46% | -29.59% | 243.00% | 90.48% | -41.01% | 42.40% |
CYL.AX Catalyst Metals Limited | -9.99% | 193.45% | 216.30% | -33.33% | -39.71% | -13.27% | -18.89% | 52.65% | 39.33% | 157.30% |
Different Trading Currencies
OLA.TO is traded in CAD, while CYL.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the CYL.AX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLA.TO achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly higher than CYL.AX's -9.99% return. Over the past 10 years, OLA.TO has outperformed CYL.AX with an annualized return of 64.97%, while CYL.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 28.90% annualized return.
OLA.TO
- 1D
- 10.03%
- 1M
- -24.17%
- YTD
- 21.31%
- 6M
- 49.19%
- 1Y
- 66.62%
- 3Y*
- 51.74%
- 5Y*
- 36.42%
- 10Y*
- 64.97%
CYL.AX
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- -9.99%
- 6M
- -16.57%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 91.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX — Risk / Return Rank
OLA.TO
CYL.AX
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) and Catalyst Metals Limited (CYL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OLA.TO | CYL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.24 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 0.83 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 0.36 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 0.81 | +3.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OLA.TO | CYL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.24 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.40 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.46 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.41 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between OLA.TO and CYL.AX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Dividend Comparison
OLA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while CYL.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | |
|---|---|
OLA.TO Orla Mining Ltd. | 0.09% |
CYL.AX Catalyst Metals Limited | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLA.TO drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, smaller than the maximum CYL.AX drawdown of -86.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLA.TO and CYL.AX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLA.TO | CYL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -91.67% | +22.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.78% | -41.60% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.00% | -79.82% | +27.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.61% | -85.62% | +29.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.60% | -34.65% | +10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -37.77% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 18.55% | -3.62% |
Volatility
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) is 22.57%, while Catalyst Metals Limited (CYL.AX) has a volatility of 28.19%. This indicates that OLA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OLA.TO | CYL.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.57% | 28.19% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.34% | 50.23% | +6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.53% | 68.99% | +5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.88% | 63.42% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.07% | 61.93% | +13.14% |
Financials
OLA.TO vs. CYL.AX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orla Mining Ltd. and Catalyst Metals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities