OILU vs. TQQQ
OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 3 years, OILU returned 10.60%/yr vs 69.49%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.53% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 64.46% return.
OILU
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- 96.53%
- 6M
- 77.49%
- 1Y
- 115.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 33.35%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 55.93%
- 1Y
- 137.89%
- 3Y*
- 69.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.37%
- 10Y*
- 45.33%
OILU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN | 96.53% | -16.50% | -21.65% | -32.50% | 151.08% | -17.87% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 64.46% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILU and TQQQ is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between OILU and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OILU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILU
TQQQ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
OILU
TQQQ
Basic Materials
OILU
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
OILU
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
OILU
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
OILU
-
TQQQ
Financial Services
OILU
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
OILU
-
TQQQ
Industrials
OILU
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
OILU
-
TQQQ
Technology
OILU
-
TQQQ
Utilities
OILU
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OILU
TQQQ
OILU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.75 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 12.27 | -3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.92 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.74 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
OILU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.00% | -81.66% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.51% | -36.97% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.09% | -58.04% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.14% | -0.76% | -46.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -18.52% | -32.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.32% | 11.28% | +2.04% |
Volatility
OILU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 25.14% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.14% | 13.29% | +11.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.94% | 36.04% | +13.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.23% | 47.60% | +14.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 66.53% | +14.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.16% | 65.96% | +15.20% |
OILU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILU and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILU has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 69.49% vs 10.60% for OILU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 69.49% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILU and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.
OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILU and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer